NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Fasteners From Japan; Preliminary Results of Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order Monday, December 6, 1982 *54846 AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results of Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce has conducted an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain fasteners from Japan. The review covers the period January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1980. As a result of this review, the Department has preliminarily determined the amount of the aggregate net subsidy to be 0.15 percent of the f.o.b. invoice price of the merchandise. The Department considers this rate to be de minimis. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 6, 1982. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Joseph A. Black or Richard Moreland, Office of Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 377-2786. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 29, 1981, the Department of Commerce ("the Department") published in the Federal Register (46 FR 53484) the final results of its last administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain fasteners from Japan (42 FR 23147, May 6, 1977; 44 FR 31972, June 4, 1979) and announced its intent to conduct the next administrative review by the end of May 1982. As required by section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Tariff Act"), the Department has now conducted that administrative review. Scope of the Review Imports covered by the review are all fasteners currently classifiable under items 646.5400 and 646.5600, and non-metric fasteners currently classifiable under items 646.1700, 646.4000, 646,4100, 646.4920, 646.4940, 646.5100, 646.5300, 646.5800, 646.6020, 646.6040, 646.6320, 646.6340, 646.6500, 646.7200, 646.7400, 646.7500, 646.7600 and 646.7800 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States Annotated. The review covers the period January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1980, and two programs found countervailable in the final determinations plus other lending programs that were included in our last review. These programs are: (1) The deferral of income taxes on export earnings under the Overseas Market Development Reserve ("OMDR"), (2) benefits received under the "Temporary Measures Act for Small and Midsized Businesses With Regard to the High Yen Exchange Market" ("High Yen Law"), and (3) other loans given at preferential rates by the People's Finance Corporation, the Bank of Commerce and Industrial Cooperatives, the Small Business Finance Corporation, and the Japan Development Bank. We determined in our last administrative review that the benefits from one additional program, export promotion assistance provided by the Japanese External Trade Organization ("JETRO"), which had been previously held countervailable, were not subsidies within the meaning of the Tariff Act. Analysis of Programs (1) OMDR. The OMDR program is offered by the Japanese government to firms with a total capitalization of 500 million yen, or less. The program allows a firm the opportunity to set aside a portion of income earned on overseas operations. The amount set aside escapes taxation for upt to 5 years. Twenty percent of the amount set aside must be returned to taxable income each year, and the total amount must be returned by the end of the fifth year. We have treated the taxes owed on these amounts set aside as zero interest loans made by the government, and have calculated the benefit under the OMDR program to be 0.12 percent ad valorem. (2) High Yen Law. During the period of review, the fastener industry took advantage of two of the four methods of assistance originally available under the High Yen Law, loans at preferential rates and deferment of repayment of those loans. The third method, the right to carry back current losses for up to three years in order to offset income, corporate, and local taxes paid in prior years, was terminated in 1979. The final method of assistance, special government credit guarantees, was not utilized by the fastener industry. We have calculated the aggregate benefit derived from the High Yen Law to be 0.03 percent ad valorem. (3) Other Preferential Loan Programs. Based on information received from the Japanese government we find that there were no preferential loans given to the fastener industry during the period of review by the People's Finance Corporation, the Bank of Commerce and Industrial Cooperatives, the Small Business Finance Corporation or the Japan Development Bank. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine that the aggregate net subsidy conferred by the programs cited above is 0.15 percent ad valorem. We consider this rate, since it is less than 0.5 percent ad valorem, to be de minimis. Accordingly, the Department intends to instruct the Customs Service to liquidate shipments of this merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 1980 and exported on or before December 31, 1980 without regard to countervailing duties. Further, the Department intends to instruct the Customs Service to continue to waive the collection of a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties, as provided for by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act, on all shipments entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of the current review. This deposit waiver shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review. Interested parties may submit written comments on these preliminary results within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice and may request disclosure and/or a hearing within 10 days of the date of publication. Any request for an administrative protective order must be made no later than 5 days after the date of publication. The Department will publish the final results of this administrative review including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such written comments or at a hearing. This administrative review and notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and section 355.41 of the Commerce Regulations (19 CFR 355.41). *54847 Dated: December 1, 1982. Gary N. Horlick, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 82-33169 Filed 12-3-82; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-25-M